Skip to content

Traditional vs. Digital

There has been an ongoing debate for the past decade regarding which marketing medium provided advertisers with the best return on investment: traditional vs. digital. Traditional media buying would include: television, radio, newspaper, et al. Digital marketing includes: search engine marketing, banner ads, rich media and the newcomer streaming media. The truth of the matter is that I’ve seen both mechanism generate great and terrible results, it’s my experience that everything boils down to execution ultimately. However I want to briefly discuss each option.

Traditional Media

Traditional marketing has been around for ages and is thus a well established marketing machine. It has been attacked lately with the advent of TiVo and Satellite radio, however it remains a bastion of brand safe advertising distribution. There is very little fraud in traditional media, which enables a fairly worry free environment for clients. With the positives in mind it is also important to understand the drawbacks:

  1. Archaic analytic reporting;
  2. High level of risk;
  3. Lack of control.
  4. It is cost prohibitive for small businesses.

Digital Marketing

Digital, or online, advertising has been the fastest growing industry in the past decade and has birthed global corporate giants like Google and Yahoo! It addresses many of the negatives of traditional marketing, such as:

  1. Full analytics reporting, you know exactly when and where your ads have been displayed.
  2. With performance based campaigns, there is little to no risk at stake.
  3. You have full control over the campaign.
  4. Companies of any size can advertise online, due to little to no minimum advertising buys.

It may sound like I am one sided in this debate, and it is true, I believe very strongly in the power of digital marketing; however it is also paramount to remember that the key to a successful marketing campaign is matching the right message to the right audience.  Contact us and we can help create a marketing plan that matches your needs.

Risk Intelligence

What's Your Risk IQ?

What's Your Marketing Risk IQ?

Marketing is a risk intensive endeavor, there is a wide ranging risk vs. reward matrix which can bring even the most innovative experts to their knees. So why am I telling you this? It’s because I want to describe the OAG marketing mechanisms and illustrate how they each minimize risk while simultaneously maximizing the reward. Below is a basic walk-through of each service:

1. BlogSpur

The BlogSpur service is a multi-faceted social media marketing service produces long term results with minimal risk. The OAG Social Media and Search Engine Specialists dramatically increase a brand’s online web presence through blog postings and social media syndication. The fees are minimal compared to hiring a blogger and the service produces industry leading results.

2. AdSpur

AdSpur is a performance based marketing service. This means there is little to no risk for you as an advertiser. You only pay when you receive an order, lead or visitor.

3. Tricor Public Relations

If you are looking for your company to receive online or offline press exposure, a strong PR push is required. This does have a higher risk compared to the BlogSpur and AdSpur services since the fees are higher and there are no guaranteed results. However the rewards are potentially exponential. Several companies such as Facebook and YouTube built their businesses purely on a solid public relations and press outreach strategy.

In the current economic condition of the nation, it is key to make every penny of your marketing dollar count, so choose wisely and let us help you create a marketing solution that fits your situation.

Performance

We are witnessing history right now, the past six consecutive days have seen three digit drops in the dow each day. Because of this I’ve received countless emails from friends asking if we’ve seen a decrease in ad buys, and my answer is: yes AND no. We have seen drops in traditional marketing (tv and radio) and traditional display (CPM banners). However our gross revenues and profit are up by over 30%. How is this possible? Companies are starting to migrate their advertising budgets to performance based campaigns. Performance based marketing campaigns consist of:

  • Cost per Click
  • Cost per Lead
  • Cost per Action.

And since these marketing mechanisms are low risk to the advertiser, they are actually getting one of the highest return on their marketing investment in years! Regardless of how poor the economy is, companies still need to make sales and in order to make sales they need to market their product and brand. In an effort to ensure our clients remain profitable with their ad campaigns, we have progressively been moving our clients to performance campaigns. Right now is the time to be smart with your marketing dollars and there are plenty of outlets for you to cost-effectively reach new customers.

Movement Marketing

I walked with my wife and in-laws this weekend at the Susan G. Komen “Walk for the Cure”. After the walk we were ushered into a parking lot lined up with the walk’s sponsors. Fortune 500 companies such as AT&T and Starbucks along with regional companies. I wanted to talk in this post about the difference between embracing a movement compared to simply throwing money to a cause.

The powerhouse regional gym called BodyWorks had created Breast Cancer giveaways along with providing activities for kids and families. Needless to say, their booth was crowded to overflowing. Compare that with Best Buy who had a very large booth with had nothing that was relevant to the event. It doesn’t take a marketing degree to know that BodyWorks made a strong brand impression on a large percentage of the thousands of attendees. And not only did Best Buy not make a positive impression, they most likely damaged their brand’s perception since anyone walking by their booth would see them as a large impersonal company that is simply attempting to “buy” their way into a non-profit event.

This example has illustrated clearly to me the importance of having a clear regional strategy if you are in the retail industry. Best Buy has been getting extremely negative press lately (coverage), and if this weekend was an accurate depiction of their market plan, it’s clear they need to make some changes.

Going Viral

I’m on the bike at the gym right now, blogging from my blackberry (what can I say, life’s been busy since the transition). And I wanted to talk about viral marketing. Here at OAG we’ve done our fair share of traditional media buys on every platform you can imagine (TV, Radio, billboards, Search Engines, et al), however very few things excite me as much as a well executed viral marketing campaign. So what factors determine whether a viral campaign is successful?

Here are three prerequisites you have to have:

1. Timing and Targeting Positioning you viral campaign at the write time is vital if you want it to catch on. Examples of this are: Santa Claus pranks during the holiday season or new product launches during New Years. Targeting is also very important, keep in mind that there are more online video sites than Youtube. Some of the best viral campaigns I’ve seen have started on Vimeo and Break.com.

2. Entertainment level If the video is boring, NO ONE IS GOING to watch it, much less send it to their friends. Make sure your campaign is either funny or extremely intriguing.

3. Clarity You viral campaign could be shown to the right audience at the right time, however if the message isn’t clear it will simple be ignored. One of the companies that did a great job of this recently was ZAGG. ZAGG manufactures protective iPhone and iPod cases, and they produced a great viral campaign that spread all over the web, one of the clips is below.

Is Traditional Advertising Dying Online?

As everyone discusses the state of old world media such as TV, Radio and Print advertising being in the midst of a transitional period, I would like to talk about how old world online advertising is also on the way out.

As I talk with companies that are looking to run marketing campaigns to spotlight their brands, products or services, I’m hearing some very interesting perspectives from our clients, and I live by the #1 Business rule that the customer is always right.  So what am I hearing from clients?  CEO’s and CMO’s are no longer satisfied with simply running banner campaigns that drive brand recognition, they are now pushing for us to help them attain a ubiquitous Internet presence.  And because of this evolved mindset, comes my favorite part: companies are not looking for agencies to simply create ad campaigns anymore, they are looking for us to be their business development partner.

A good example of this is what we are doing for a health and wellness client we have.  As opposed to simply developing a marketing strategy for them, we formed several strategic partnerships with gyms around the country to market this particular companies services.  And because the relationship was mutually beneficial for both parties, we were able to get the client a far wider and more targeted reach then they would have gotten by a ad buy, and it was able to be accomplished for pennies on the dollar.  The result was that the client got the highest return on their marketing investment that they had ever gotten, and we’re working on something pretty cool for them right now.

Each quarter it seems as though fewer and fewer clients are wanting to buy the traditional forms of online marketing, however I don’t believe that it is due to the economy since the majority of our clients have been increasing their overall marketing budgets that we manage.  Instead, these clients are asking how they can take advantage of the social media mechanisms that are currently in place.  They hear all about outlets such as Twitter and Youtube, and they want to be at the forefront of these online activites.  And they know that simply buying banner ads on an ad network is the closest thing you can do to burning money.

A great example of what I’m talking about is illustrated perfectly by some of the most innovative shows in the online world, Diggnation.  Diggnation was founded by the the CEO and Founder of Digg.com, the popular online new aggregator, Kevin Rose.  The show is extremely popular in the online community with tens of millions of views.  And as opposed to trying to run pre rolls to monetize the show, Diggnation actually sells product placements in the show.  This past Friday they actually talked about their beer sponsor for about 3 and a half minutes (all positive things to say of course).  This type of marketing is the closest an advertiser can get to true word-of-mouth marketing.  I understand that these types of ads are not scalable, however they give the online advertiser the best return on investment since they are talking with a highly engaged viewer.

So when you’re listening to people talking about how the old mediums of media are dying, just know the online world, in it’s current state, is not the future either.

A New Age

The Missing Piece(s)

The Missing Piece(s)

For industry insiders, I think you will enjoy the inside joke with the title of this post.  Last year, the Founder and CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckeberg, was highly criticized for telling a group of media ad agency executives that every 100 years media changes (coverage), and that Facebook was bringing everyone else into this new ‘age’.  Great statement, except for the fact that he was talking to a group of media executives who have forgotten more than Zuckeberg will ever know about online marketing.

One of my favorite guilty pleasures, Valleywag, posted an article yesterday with some great tips on how the online social networking space could actually appeal to the ad agency marketing dollars.  The tips from the ad exec are below:

Build a toll booth.
Everyone knows banner ads don’t do it for big-budget advertisers anymore— not even ones that allow users to comment on them and share with their friends, like Facebook’s new ads. Instead of creating gimmicky features that users don’t want, Facebook needs to come up with ways for advertisers to be seen as providing new functionality on Facebook itself. By way of analogy, my source told me to imagine American Express sponsoring a normally congested toll road for a day. Drivers approaching the toll booths would see them empty and maybe billboard that read: “No toll today. Drive on through and see what it’s like to be an American Express cardholder.” That’s the kind of branded experiences Facebook needs to create for users and advertisers, my source told me. Not gimmicky ones like asking users to design Mazda’s new cars or come up with new Ben and Jerry’s flavors. Facebook should encourage users to feel like a site improvement was brought to them by a brand. Maybe Facebook’s Video application should have been sponsored by Sony’s CyberShot line, for example. The challenge: Facebook’s site developers work separately from the group which comes up with ad products, a divide Facebook needs to erase.

Facebook needs to stop imagining it will ever reach Google’s size.
One reason Facebook hasn’t come up with these kinds of advertising arrangements already is that they require lots of creativity, planning and customization. They’re one-offs, and Mark Zuckerberg can’t simply program a computer to sell them over and over. It’s a terrifying reality for Facebook because its investors put money into it expecting it would become the next Google, which is an automated moneymaking machine. (Only 3,000 out of its 18,000 employees are required to run its advertising operations.) The sooner Facebook management and its investors realize that the company will not be the next Google — which, let’s face it, lucked into a ridiculously simple way of making money — the sooner it can take advantage of its massive, desirable user base.

Zuckerberg and Sandberg need to hire Madison Avenue insiders.
My source says Madison Avenue avoids spending money on MySpace because no one in New York knows its ad salespeople. Facebook needs to put Madison Avenue insiders in positions where they have Mark Zuckerberg’s ear. For example: Zuckerberg could have used someone with advertising experience to challenge him with the baby-name test before the company went forward with its Beacon ads. The baby-name test? “You know,” he said, “The one where you take the name and think of all the terrible things it rhymes with and then decide if you still like it.”

Why the Quick Dollar is Deadly

I was reading Advertising Age this morning as usual and saw that Chipotle, the healthy fast-food mexican chain, has put their marketing account up for review.  Companies switch between agencies on a regular basis for a myriad of reasons, however Chipotle made an interesting remark when they announced the event. Chipotle’s CEO Steve Ells said

“We are looking for an agency that wants to develop a long-term relationship with Chipotle and our current marketing partners.”

Notice his subtle phraseology, they are looking for someone that wants to develop a “long-term” partnership, reading between the lines of the release Ells is saying that their current agency is not interested in a long term partnership. One of the most frustrating components of being in the advertising agency ecosystem is when I see other agencies going after the quick dollar as opposed to focusing on developing a solid business relationship. With every client that I work with directly, my first priority is helping to create marketing vision for the next 3-5 years.

The majority of agencies do not have deep social media experience, and lack the fundamental knowledge of how to execute digital advertising campaigns. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve encountered a client who showed me the pricing their former agency was charging for certain campaigns, where I’ve discovered they were paying 2 to 10 times too much! This means that if the firm had performed a full due diligence process they could have gotten 2 to 10 times the exposure for their client. I can’t say the exact reasons why Chipotle left their old agency, but I can tell you that the top goal for any business relationship needs to be developing a long-term, mutually beneficial partnership. Working hard and lean in the beginning will pay both parties great results for years to come.

Why Can’t I Choose?

I don’t think I will be able to hold my frustration if I hear about another company trying to monetize social networking traffic. Ad networks such as Social Media and VideoEgg have probably done the best job in the industry up to this point with running campaigns on Facebook and the other social networks out there. However this post’s focus is different.

Is there an easier way to make money for social networks?

Is there an easier way to make money for social networks?

Most ad networks try to differentiate themselves by building targeting mechanisms into their service. If you’re in the online marketing industry, you’ve heard terms such as:

And what is the goal of each of these technologies? Getting the right ad, in front of the right user, at the right time. And as great as each of these marketing tools are, I personally believe that none of them are right for social networks by themselves. And I know I’m right because no one has been able to successfully monetize a social networking portal. And so my question is this:

Why can’t I choose my ads as a user?!

I think it’s a fair question and I haven’t seen any large social network attempt this approach. Let’s walk through how this could work practically: As a user, Facebook brings up a page on the screen the next time you sign in. This page would say something to the effect of,

“We at Facebook want to make sure that you have a great experience every time you log in, and we don’t want you to have to see ads that are irrelevant or annoying to you.” You then choose 1 or 2 verticals that interest you from a list on that page, categories like: auto, faith, finance, gaming, health, technology, travel, et al.”

Now all ads shown on Facebook would be user initiated and would have a much higher level of engagement since the user actually CHOSE the ads they are being shown. These ad units would increase dramatically in value since vertically themed ad networks are generating incredibly higher advertising rates than the other forms of interactive ad units. So hopefully these social networks will wake up realize that giving more control to their users will actually generate much more revenue.

The Social Media Ego

I was considering what the writing options were for this first real blog post, and I decided I wanted to discuss what is the root motivation behind all of these social media mediums such as: Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, etc. And since I am a fan of each of these services I believe I am well suited to self analyze why these companies are capturing our minds and dominating our daily lives.

How Much Do You Love Your Online Voice?

How Much Do You Love Your Online Voice?

This post is not going to discuss the technical specifications of any of these ‘Web 2.0′ services, there are literally thousands of blogs that have daily dialogue in regard to the social media world. However I have found very little discussion about ‘Why’ these online applications have captivated our collective psyches.

As our culture has become more and more introspective, simply put, I believe we have fallen in love with ourselves. I think that if we could run on a beach into our own arms we would do it! And with this new found love of self we have come to the, probably mistaken, notion that we are all geniuses. And we all feel that our ‘deep thoughts’ need to be shared with the world. It’s interesting to have observed the evolution of social media, see below for the time line:

1. Dating sites

We first began with ‘looking’ for other people to spend real world time with, these individuals should have common interests with us and the end goal was: physical, emotional, etc.

2. Myspace

We then moved to online social networking with Myspace (a former dating site). Myspace made it easy to make ‘online’ friends, 99.9% of whom you will never meet (hopefully).

3. Facebook

For as innovative as Mysapce was, it was mainly a static site that profiled the interests you typed into it on the day you signed up. Facebook introduced an entirely new world of connectivity when they launched the ‘News Feed’ service. The News Feed service allowed for people to track when you upload new photos, shared a link or video, and changed your ’status’.

4. Twitter/Friendfeed

Taking Facebook’s News Feed process, services like Twitter made it quick and easy to share literally every part of your online self. They allow for you to share links, blog posts, videos, bookmarks, and status updates – many times on a dynamic basis. The majority of users on these services don’t even pay attention to the other members of the community, each of these social media mechanisms are completely ’self-centric’.

So do you see the evolution? Starting with individuals searching for others online, we have migrated all the way to users being satisfied with being the talker in one sided conversations. Our inherent selfishness and narcissism, combined with technological advances, have led us down this path of egocentricity. So where are we going next? I don’t know, but I can promise you that there will be millions of opinions crossing the web, and all of them will be right (at least in one person’s mind).